Archive for the Political Party Software Category

Watch¡¡¡ How to save our children from this terrorist group?

Question by Tornado: Watch¡¡¡ How to save our children from this terrorist group?
El Yunque
What no one of the poor in Latin America knows is that there is a huge Nazi conspiracy in Latin America. Directs a group of powerful businessmen in Mexico that uses the group “El Yunque” to direct all the Nazi groups in Latin America. This control is made public through the group called “ODCA (Organization of Christian Democrats) that is responsible for all Latin American Nazi groups are coordinated to be and act according to the ideas of the YUNQUE.
El Yunque is the secret police of the PAN (National Action Party) which is the party in power in Mexico.
What is the purpose of the anvil? They have many, but the two serve as the main group of espionage and aggression against all political opponents of the PAN and also used to attack anyone who gets in the plans of entrepreneurs related to the YUNQUE. This includes the assault on workers who demand the fair and the assault on journalists and people who are publicly opposed to the PAN. And of course, is the same case in other Latin American countries, but the benefit of entrepreneurs and local fascist political parties. The second major objective of which is to gain economic control, social, political and religious from around the world, to deliver all that power to the group of powerful businessmen who operate from the shadows of the PAN.
To carry out its plan to dominate the world, use of university student or shipping of all types of agents to create cells in other countries (particularly in Latin America) then infiltrate and take the leadership of any political institution; religious and social system that can (and took power in Mexico) (In addition to using electronic fraud in Mexico, using the counting of votes in software created by a company which is a partner in the “president of Mexico Felipe Calderón ) We call on the YUNQUE “control from the ground. So get full control of all groups of society, which used to reach their goals and attack, undermine and crush all opposition. A very effective and tactical support with so much economic power, it is impossible to stop. I do not know what solution there is to it. They are unstoppable. But we must never surrender to them, for you, for all children whose souls are being destroyed, for the freedom that our families are unknowingly losing … The Nazis are powerful, but the peoples of Latin America are people of free spirit and creative in finding ways to save our freedom.

ATTACK OF THE PAN TO THE FAMILIES
El Yunque recruit millions of children and adolescents in public and private schools, and the recruits who are brain washed well, send them to Catholic churches and parishes, to lead groups of “catechism” for children and are also sent to the colonies and secondary schools to form teams of informal football or basketball or karate or hiking, to gain the trust of children who later invited to join a secret group that is false and is called the YUNQUE of the “pre”. In this study the false loyalty and fanaticism of the child. If the child seems viable, then invite him to another secret: El Yunque, where it became a recruiter, a spy who complained to his family without hesitation, that copy or steal documents from their parents and a rabid aggressor ranging from the scorn and the threat to terrorism and the selective assassination.
Hence the child is given full treatment and was filled with a total hatred and evil towards anything other than the dogmas of El Yunque. To do this, children are sent to so-called “retreats” and dads happy life My son is saying this along with some very good guys! ….. Oh, if they knew with what kind of demons are dropping their children. They tell the child: If you disobey, we will not disobey us to disobey God!
(Religious blackmail) So fanatical religiously to children.
It is clear that the leaders of the PAN does not believe in God, but a mock practice Catholicism to use religious fanaticism as a powerful tool to control children and young people who believe in his innocence is the story that are in the name of God crimes and offenses are ordered to commit.
Do not underestimate the power of religious fanaticism. A human being religious fanatic is capable of doing anything in the name of God. Remember the terrorist acts committed by the terrorist group Hezbollah, which the most common is that these people are operating with powerful explosives in the middle of crowds. How can a man be convinced that it is good to massacre women and children? Because the leaders of these groups know how to use a malicious logic and a wry sense of religion, mixed with extortion for creating a slave morality of absolute loyalty. Just prefer to recruit young people and children, because the minds of them is clean of any kind of malice, it is easy to make them fall into his frightening lies and deceptions.
Understand this: most people and youth who are used to recruit children and youth in the YUNQUE were fanatical and have total faith and allegiance to the YUNQUE a

Best answer:

Answer by Holographer
This is silly. Mexico is actually ruled by Zionists, not Nazis.

What do you think? Answer below!

GOOOH Revolution www.GOOOH.com – A New Plan – Part 2 of 7

Opening segment for the show “That’s What I Like About the South” with Bea Harrison, filmed in Biloxi, MS and aired on WXXV-TV, the Fox affilate on 5/3 (and 5/10). Join us goooh.com GOOOH Mission GOOOH stands for ‘Get Out of Our House’ and is pronounced like the word ‘go’. It is a NON-PARTISAN plan to place 435 citizen representatives on the ballot in 2012, competing for a seat in the US House of Representatives. The members of each district will have an honest opportunity to fire the career politicians who have taken over OUR House and are destroying our nation. If you are tired of career politicians, GOOOH is for you. If you believe money has corrupted Washington, GOOOH is for you. If you believe politicians have too much power, GOOOH is for you. If you are weary of the death grip the two parties have on our government, and are ready to return control of our government to the people, then GOOOH is for you. GOOOH is NOT a political party. It is a system that will allow you and your neighbors to choose, among yourselves, a candidate who will truly represent your district. Members will select a citizen representative to serve their district. How our candidates get on the ballot will be dependent on when we reach our membership goal. Our preference is to compete in the primaries against the incumbent. It is possible we may have to run as an Independent in some races, or even form a party in a few states, but the goal is to run in the primaries. It is important to clearly

How important is a certain kind of “libertarian” thinking to today’s Democratic Party?

Question by Andy F: How important is a certain kind of “libertarian” thinking to today’s Democratic Party?
I know that conservatives will scream about this question, claiming that today’s Democrats are mostly “Marxists” and “progressives” and “socialists” and so forth.

But this hasn’t mostly been true of the Democrats since Bill Clinton’s first term in the White House, has it?

Case in point: Democratic Party support (however reluctant and hesitant) for the rights of gay men & lesbians. This has nothing to do with “communism” or “socialism,” and just about everything to do with protecting equal legal rights for a persecuted minority under the U.S. Constitution.

2nd case in point: Democratic Party appeals to African Americans, Hispanic Americans, and (historically, at least) American Jews.

Again, the vast majority of the black, Hispanic and Jewish Democrats in the USA today are not “socialists” or “Marxists,” but instead are extremely interested in seeing the government protect their legal rights and economic welfare as social minorities. This again is a political stance that could also be supported by libertarians, at least many libertarians.

It’s a politics centered on equal rights for different individual Americans under the Constitution — not on the notion of the government seizing control of the economic means of production and distributing ownership of factories & farms to the proletarian masses.

3rd case in point: Democratic Party support — again, however reluctantly & hesitantly — for the right of American women to have access to legal abortion.

There is nothing “socialist” or “communist” about this position either. Instead, it’s based on the championing of greater sexual freedom and reproductive freedom for American women — another potentially “Libertarian” issue.

Fourth case in point: Historic tilt of Democratic Party’s economic thinking, since the mid-1990s, towards support for the computer hardware & software industries and Silicon Valley. This may or may not represent a legitimate exercise of government power, but again, it’s a matter of the Democratic Party championing particular capitalist economic interests — not a matter of favoring a general redistrubution of property and power in the US.

Fifth case in point: Democratic Party support (at least sometimes) for “free trade” policies

Sixth case in point: Democratic Party support (at times) for the rights of legal & illegal immigrants.

Aren’t almost almost all of these classic “Democratic” policies also the kinds of policies that moderate libertarians might also support? And aren’t all of them a disappointment to Americans who actually call ourselves socialists?
Clarification for Myx –

I’m a former libertarian, former liberal & current socialist.

I’ve been angry at the Democratic Party since — well, since Lyndon Johnson championed the Vietnam War in the 1960s, but especially since Bill Clinton’s presidency in the 1990s.

I generally favor greater civil and legal rights for gay people, women & African Americans; generally oppose free trade, generally oppose immigration, although I like individual immigrants.

As a socialist and even as a former liberal, I’m appalled to see Bill Clinton, say, being portrayed as a man of the “socialist” left. Mostly because of the intellectual sloppiness of this, I think.

Best answer:

Answer by Myx is back
Nice spin. Are you an intern at MSNBC or just a Huffinglue post blogger?

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Ask TFC #15

(YTO 269-96) Questions covering a range of things from what I use to make videos to relationship advice My world map: tinfoilchef.com also, please be sure to check out my Minecraft Adventure on my other channel youtube.com Minecraft -29- The Mob Tower (Part 1) www.youtube.com Minecraft -30- The Mob Tower (part 2) www.youtube.com Minecraft -31- The Mob Tower (part 3) www.youtube.com The latest phat trek story so far: chapter 1 ‘Vendetta’ www.youtube.com chapter 2 ‘Grudge’ www.youtube.com chapter 3 ‘Anihilator’ www.youtube.com chapter 4 ‘Pursuit’ www.youtube.com Thanks for watching! Samples use from freesound.org By Glaneur de sons woosh_02.wav tinyurl.com By hans earthquakes.wav tinyurl.com Music: “Hero Theme”, “Achaidh Cheide”, “Epic Unease” by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com TinFoilChef Facebook Page www.facebook.com My personal Facebook www.facebook.com My blog: tinfoilchef.com “ask tfc” questions answers video editing software camera relationship advice minecraft tnt “mob trap” birthday eyes boiled politics “political party” yto orbit tinfoilchefdotcom .
Video Rating: 5 / 5

Has MoveOn Betrayed the Democratic Party?

Question by mission_viejo_california: Has MoveOn Betrayed the Democratic Party?
.

Has MoveOn Betrayed the Democratic Party?

With its full-page “General Betray Us?” ad in the New York Times, MoveOn.org has once again put itself at the forefront of the antiwar movement. And if past patterns are any guide, a number of Democrats are embarrassed, and even angered, by MoveOn’s actions but are afraid to reveal the true extent of their feelings. MoveOn simply has too much fundraising clout — and a fear-inducing inclination to attack Democrats who stray from the MoveOn line — for many in the party to take it on.

Democratic leaders might be further embarrassed by a new email, headlined “Your dog can help end the war,” sent out by the leadership of MoveOn’s political team. The email asks members to attend a protest on Capitol Hill this morning preceding the testimony of Gen. David Petraeus. “Congress was fooled before by the White House’s ‘dog and pony show,” the appeal says. “We need to make sure they’re not fooled again. That’s why we’re hosting our own ‘Dog and Pony Show’ outside the Capitol Building right before Petraeus takes the stage for his testimony. We want to show Congress and the cameras that the American people aren’t buying the White House spin.”

“We’re bringing real ponies, signs and a big banner that reads, ‘CONGRESS: Don’t be fooled, AGAIN!’ Can you make it — and bring your dog if you have one?”

It seems unlikely that many top Democrats will be bringing pets. But the thing that should trouble party leaders is not that MoveOn is capable of silly stunts. It’s not even that MoveOn is capable of making slanderous comments about U.S. military officials. And it’s not that MoveOn is against the war in Iraq, which polls show many Americans believe was a mistake. Rather, MoveOn’s latest campaign is a continuation of a drive to oppose not just the action in Iraq, but the war on terror in general, and, in a larger sense, America’s use of military power in its own defense.

MoveOn was founded in 1998 by a husband-and-wife team of Berkeley, California software developers named Wes Boyd and Joan Blades. Its original mission was to oppose the Clinton impeachment. In 1999, after the impeachment trial ended with Clinton’s acquittal, MoveOn moved on to defeating Republicans who had favored impeachment. It mostly failed in that effort, and soon after the 2000 elections found itself without a clear political goal. All that changed on September 11, 2001.

At a time when polls showed a huge majority of Americans favoring military action against the terrorists who attacked New York and Washington, MoveOn put its energy into opposing the war in Afghanistan. Shortly after the terrorist attacks, Boyd and Blades circulated a petition that read, “Our leaders are under tremendous pressure to act in the aftermath of the terrible events of Sept. 11th. We the undersigned support justice, not escalating violence, which would only play into the terrorists’ hands.”

At the same time, an activist named Eli Pariser, recently graduated from college, circulated a petition of his own, calling on George W. Bush to use “moderation and restraint” in responding to 9/11 and “to use, wherever possible, international judicial institutions and international human rights law to bring to justice those responsible for the attacks, rather than the instruments of war, violence or destruction.” Boyd and Blades were so impressed by Pariser’s work that they hired him; he now is a top MoveOn official.

In recent years, MoveOn has sought to portray itself as the voice of what Pariser often calls the true American majority. For example, in the summer of 2004 MoveOn teamed with filmmaker Michael Moore to promote Moore’s movie Fahrenheit 9/11. The week before the film premiered, Pariser asked members to sign a pledge to see it during its first weekend; the point, he explained, was not simply to show support for Moore’s picture but to create the impression in the press that Fahrenheit 9/11 was the leading edge of a wave of anti-Bush anger sweeping the country. “We launched this campaign around Fahrenheit 9/11 because to the media, the pundits, and the politicians in power, the movie’s success will be seen as a cultural referendum on the Bush administration and the Iraq war,” Pariser told MoveOn members. “Together, we have an opportunity to knock this ball out of the park.”

Several leading Democrats, including then-Sen. Minority Leader Tom Daschle, showed up at the movie’s Washington premiere. But the connection with MoveOn worried other Democrats. “You’ve got to reject Michael Moore and the MoveOn crowd,” Al From, of the Democratic Leadership Council, remarked, calling MoveOn’s members “elites, people who sit in their basements all the time and play on their computers.” Other critics noticed that MoveOn attracted a membership that was mostly white, well-to-do, far-to-the-left, and not entirely representative of the Democratic party as a whole.

Now, with the “General Betray Us” campaign, those Democrats again face the question: Do they dare to cross MoveOn? Not long after the 2004 elections, Pariser famously said of Democrats, “Now it’s our party. We bought it, we own it, and we’re going to take it back.” The next few days could be crucial in determining whether he was right or not.

Best answer:

Answer by Samuel Crow777
Move on does the world a service, by exposing the Lie of the Iraq war, and all the lies that came before and after it.

This is a criminal regime, and will be exposed as such in the future.

Bush was a liar from the beginning, and will be a liar in the end.

Add your own answer in the comments!

Social & Policy Innovation in the Obama Admin 1o2

Social & Policy Innovation in the Obama Admin 1o2
5533293078 bc94719333 Social & Policy Innovation in the Obama Admin 1o2

Image by dpict.info
This panel will looked at different approaches for incorporating innovation across the Obama Administration, including encouraging innovation across an entire discipline with the Department of Education’s Race to the Top; supporting impact investing through the Small Business Administration’s new Impact Investment Fund; using social investment as a diplomatic strategy; and developing policy frameworks supportive of these broad-ranging endeavors. Members of the Administration from the Department of Education, Small Business Administration, USAID, and others will discuss their work and their approaches to innovation and engage in Q&A with audience members.

Moderator:
Greg Nelson, Deputy Director, White House Office of Public Engagement
Greg works with the business, non-profit, advocacy, and technology communities to engage with the Administration on critical energy, climate, and technology issues. Before joining the Obama-Biden Administration, Greg was the CEO and co-founder of Green Harvest Technologies (GHT), an applications and marketing company that developed a line of "clean and green" consumer products using bio-based plastics and fibers. Prior to GHT, Greg was the General Manager of the Politics and Public Policy division for a non-profit software and strategy provider and a partner and Managing Director of CTSG, a 75-person technology and consulting firm. Greg has also been a speechwriter, has worked at the U.S. Peace Corps, and has been a speaker on technology, business, and sustainability at national conferences and retreats. Greg received his B.A. in Political Science and History from Yale University.

Panelists:

Ellen Kim: Senior Advisor, Office of Investment and Innovation, Small Business Administration
Ellen Kim is a Senior Advisor in the Office of Investment and Innovation at the Small Business Administration working on various interagency initiatives for high-growth, high-impact small businesses. Prior to her work at the SBA, Ellen was in investment banking at Citigroup in the Municipal Securities Division and has worked in management consulting as well as striking out on her own as an independent consultant to various start-ups and small businesses, mostly assisting with finance and operations. Ellen holds a B.S. in Economics from MIT and an MBA from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business, where she received certificates for Global Management and Public Management.

Erin Mote: Chief of Party, Global Broadband and Innovations Alliance, USAID
Dr. Erin Mote has close to a decade of experience forging alliances with private corporations, NGOs, and governments to drive the development of corporate strategies that provide a double bottom line of profit and social good. She has worked with more than fifty Fortune 500 companies, including Diageo, Chevron, UPS, and Wal-Mart. In her current capacity as Chief of Party for the USAID Global Broadband and Innovators Alliance, she is charged with driving connectivity, mobile solutions, and innovation throughout USAID’s global development portfoliio. Prior to this role, Erin served in senior positions with CHF international and the Coulter Companies after starting her career in her native Arizona as the Director of External and Strategic Relations for Arizona State University. She holds a PhD in International Relations from Johns Hopkins SAIS, two masters–one in Russian and Eastern European Studies and the other in Public Administration–and graduated Phi Beta Kappa from the University of Michigan. She serves in advisory and leadership capacities for several civic organizations, including the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, the Clinton Foundation, the Junior League of Washington, and NetImpact.

Mark Newberg: Senior Advisor, Office of Policy and Strategic Planning, Small Business Administration
Mark Newberg is a Senior Advisor in the Office of Policy and Strategic Planning at the US Small Business Administration, where his primary areas of focus include impact investing, innovation, inter-agency initiatives, and disaster recovery. Mark previously served as an Advisor to the New Orleans City Council following Hurricane Katrina, where he was tasked with "big-picture policy," green/clean development, intergovernmental relations, and multi-sector partnerships. He has been a columnist for the Huffington Post and www.takepart.com and has advised the occasional start-up company as well. Mark holds a BA in Political Science from Tulane University and a JD from Tulane Law School and was a Visiting Student at Harvard Law School.

Christopher Hitchens on Vladimir Zhirinovsky and Parliamentary Systems (1994 Part 8)

November 21, 1994 www.amazon.com Watch the full program: thefilmarchived.blogspot.com Vladimir Volfovich Zhirinovsky (Russian: Влади́мир Во́льфович Жирино́вский, born April 25, 1946 as Vladimir Volfovich Eidelstein) is a Russian politician, colonel of the Russian Army, founder and the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR), Vice-Chairman of the State Duma, and a member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. Despite its name, the LDPR is usually described as a radical nationalist party. Question Time in a parliament occurs when members of the parliament ask questions of Government Ministers (including the Prime Minister) which they are obliged to answer. It usually occurs daily while parliament is sitting, though it can be cancelled in exceptional circumstances. Question Time originated in the Westminster system of the United Kingdom, but occurs in several other countries as well. In practice, the questions asked in Question Time are usually pre-arranged by the organisers of each party; although the questions are usually without notice. Questions from government backbenchers are either intended to allow the Minister to discuss the virtues of government policy, or to attack the opposition. A typical format of such a government backbencher’s question might be “Could the Minister discuss the benefits of the government’s initiative on -issue-, and is the Minister aware of any alternative policies in this area?” Ministers may attempt to avoid
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Switzerland’s Anti-PowerPoint Party

default Switzerlands Anti PowerPoint Party

Transcript by www.newsy.com BY EMOKE BEBIAK You’re watching multisource world video news analysis from Newsy. A new political party in Switzerland aims to unite people with strong feelings–against PowerPoint. The Anti-PowerPoint Party — or APPP — is currently collecting signatures in hopes of becoming a parliamental party with one goal in mind. The party’s mission statement says… “The APPP sees itself as the advocate of approximately 250 Million people worldwide, who, every month, are obliged to be present during boring presentations…and who had up to now no representation in politics.” The party was founded by Matthias Poehm, a public speaking trainer. He claims students and coworkers who do not use Power Point for their presentations are often punished. He tells World Radio Switzerland APPP is a one issue party… Reporter “Are you just gonna campaign against PowerPoint or do you have other problems with office equipment, maybe office stationary or coffee machines, or anything like that?” Poehm: “No, no, you’re absolutely right, I just focus on that topic.” Poehm points out– the green movement and women’s rights movements has their beginnings in one-issue parties. While the APPP doesn’t aim to ban PowerPoint altogether–it wants to give people a choice. (Video: YouTube) TG Daily reports– Poehm says he has a legitimate reason for hating on Power Point–it hurts the Swiss economy… “Poehm reckons that the use of the presentation software costs Switzerland 2.1
Video Rating: 5 / 5

Social & Policy Innovation in the Obama Admin 2o2

Social & Policy Innovation in the Obama Admin 2o2
5532711895 85d5ae5b46 Social & Policy Innovation in the Obama Admin 2o2

Image by dpict.info
This panel will looked at different approaches for incorporating innovation across the Obama Administration, including encouraging innovation across an entire discipline with the Department of Education’s Race to the Top; supporting impact investing through the Small Business Administration’s new Impact Investment Fund; using social investment as a diplomatic strategy; and developing policy frameworks supportive of these broad-ranging endeavors. Members of the Administration from the Department of Education, Small Business Administration, USAID, and others will discuss their work and their approaches to innovation and engage in Q&A with audience members.

Moderator:
Greg Nelson, Deputy Director, White House Office of Public Engagement
Greg works with the business, non-profit, advocacy, and technology communities to engage with the Administration on critical energy, climate, and technology issues. Before joining the Obama-Biden Administration, Greg was the CEO and co-founder of Green Harvest Technologies (GHT), an applications and marketing company that developed a line of "clean and green" consumer products using bio-based plastics and fibers. Prior to GHT, Greg was the General Manager of the Politics and Public Policy division for a non-profit software and strategy provider and a partner and Managing Director of CTSG, a 75-person technology and consulting firm. Greg has also been a speechwriter, has worked at the U.S. Peace Corps, and has been a speaker on technology, business, and sustainability at national conferences and retreats. Greg received his B.A. in Political Science and History from Yale University.

Panelists:

Ellen Kim: Senior Advisor, Office of Investment and Innovation, Small Business Administration
Ellen Kim is a Senior Advisor in the Office of Investment and Innovation at the Small Business Administration working on various interagency initiatives for high-growth, high-impact small businesses. Prior to her work at the SBA, Ellen was in investment banking at Citigroup in the Municipal Securities Division and has worked in management consulting as well as striking out on her own as an independent consultant to various start-ups and small businesses, mostly assisting with finance and operations. Ellen holds a B.S. in Economics from MIT and an MBA from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business, where she received certificates for Global Management and Public Management.

Erin Mote: Chief of Party, Global Broadband and Innovations Alliance, USAID
Dr. Erin Mote has close to a decade of experience forging alliances with private corporations, NGOs, and governments to drive the development of corporate strategies that provide a double bottom line of profit and social good. She has worked with more than fifty Fortune 500 companies, including Diageo, Chevron, UPS, and Wal-Mart. In her current capacity as Chief of Party for the USAID Global Broadband and Innovators Alliance, she is charged with driving connectivity, mobile solutions, and innovation throughout USAID’s global development portfoliio. Prior to this role, Erin served in senior positions with CHF international and the Coulter Companies after starting her career in her native Arizona as the Director of External and Strategic Relations for Arizona State University. She holds a PhD in International Relations from Johns Hopkins SAIS, two masters–one in Russian and Eastern European Studies and the other in Public Administration–and graduated Phi Beta Kappa from the University of Michigan. She serves in advisory and leadership capacities for several civic organizations, including the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, the Clinton Foundation, the Junior League of Washington, and NetImpact.

Mark Newberg: Senior Advisor, Office of Policy and Strategic Planning, Small Business Administration
Mark Newberg is a Senior Advisor in the Office of Policy and Strategic Planning at the US Small Business Administration, where his primary areas of focus include impact investing, innovation, inter-agency initiatives, and disaster recovery. Mark previously served as an Advisor to the New Orleans City Council following Hurricane Katrina, where he was tasked with "big-picture policy," green/clean development, intergovernmental relations, and multi-sector partnerships. He has been a columnist for the Huffington Post and www.takepart.com and has advised the occasional start-up company as well. Mark holds a BA in Political Science from Tulane University and a JD from Tulane Law School and was a Visiting Student at Harvard Law School.

PPS Group: Localism – Political map iPhone app demo

Welcome to the demo of the PPS guide to local and national government in Great Britain. This app is the first of its kind; an interactive political map providing in depth detail of political control and composition and contact links for every level of government. The app includes; full address, phone, email contacts and searchable maps for every local council; GPS mapping for every constituency and council and lists every constituency and MP with links to photos, biographies and majority details. Plus full composition breakdown and links to every member of the House of Lords, GLA , Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly are now included. Main features: • Interactive political party overview map of Great Britain • Full listing for every constituency and MP with photos, biographies, email addresses and majorities • Full political composition of every local council with next election date, voting cycle and authority type — in alphabetical list or through map search • Political composition breakdown for House of Commons, House of Lords, GLA, Scottish Parliament and the National Assembly for Wales — with links to every member • My location GPS address finder for every council and MP • Email, telephone and website links for every council and web links to every level of government To download the app to your iPhone visit the app store and search for “political map”

Incoming search terms:

  • political parties application for iphone